1997 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1997Overall Score48.25/100
1997 Ford Galaxy vs 1997 Mazda 626 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.0 D GLX Comprex (75 Hp) 1997Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
48.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GalaxySpecificationMazda 626
FordMakeMazda
GalaxyModel626
1997Model year1997
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford GalaxySpecificationMazda 626
17,1 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
160 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
210 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GalaxySpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GalaxySpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65R15Tyre size195/60 R15 88 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford GalaxySpecificationMazda 626
4641 mmLength4700 mm
1810 mmWidth1750 mm
1732 mmHeight1400 mm
1670 KgWeight1265 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Ford Galaxy and 1997 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…