DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Galaxy vs 2004 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolvo
GalaxyModelV40
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
181 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
116 HPPower122 HP
285 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4641 mmLength4516 mm
1810 mmWidth1716 mm
1730 mmHeight1425 mm
1725 KgWeight1260 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Galaxy and 2004 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…