2016 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 2.0 EcoBoost (245 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Ford Fusion vs 2011 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 5.0 LR V8 (510 Hp) 2011Overall Score86.75/100
WINNER
Land Rover Range Rover
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 11 points.
75.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FusionSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
FordMakeLand Rover
FusionModelRange Rover
2016Model year2011
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford FusionSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
7,2 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
244 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement5000 cc
245 HPPower510 HP
373 NmTorque625 Nm
4Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FusionSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank105 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption14,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FusionSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/40 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FusionSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4872 mmLength4972 mm
1852 mmWidth—
1478 mmHeight1865 mm
1599 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Fusion and 2011 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 11 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…