2016 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 2.0 EcoBoost (245 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Ford Fusion vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 T-GDI (278 Hp) 2013Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.
75.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FusionSpecificationKia Optima
FordMakeKia
FusionModelOptima
2016Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford FusionSpecificationKia Optima
7,2 s0–100 km/h—
244 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
245 HPPower278 HP
373 NmTorque365 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FusionSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FusionSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/40 R19Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FusionSpecificationKia Optima
4872 mmLength4845 mm
1852 mmWidth1830 mm
1478 mmHeight1455 mm
1599 KgWeight1433 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2795 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Fusion and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…