2002 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 1.6 TDCi (90 Hp) 2002Overall Score53.25/100
2002 Ford Fusion vs 2002 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 16V (101 Hp) 2002Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FusionSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FordMakeVolkswagen
FusionModelPolo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Ford FusionSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
12,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
176 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
90 HPPower101 HP
204 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FusionSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FusionSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/55 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FusionSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4020 mmLength3743 mm
1708 mmWidth1632 mm
1503 mmHeight1418 mm
1105 KgWeight925 Kg
2488 mmWheelbase2407 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Fusion and 2002 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…