2004 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 1.6 Duratec (100 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
2004 Ford Fusion vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2004Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Ford Fusion
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
FordMakeMitsubishi
FusionModelLancer
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
10,9 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
178 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
143 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
9 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4020 mmLength4485 mm
1708 mmWidth1695 mm
1503 mmHeight1480 mm
1080 KgWeight1360 Kg
2488 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford Fusion and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…