DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford Fusion vs 2016 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points.

70.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeKia
FusionModelOptima
2017Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
221 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
181 HPPower245 HP
251 NmTorque353 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4872 mmLength4855 mm
1852 mmWidth1860 mm
1478 mmHeight1465 mm
1575 KgWeight1580-1680 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford Fusion and 2016 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…