DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Fusion vs 2016 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fusion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

70.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeKia
FusionModelOptima
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h—
221 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
181 HPPower154 HP
251 NmTorque189 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
62 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption1,33 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
235/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4872 mmLength4855 mm
1852 mmWidth1860 mm
1478 mmHeight1465 mm
1575 KgWeight1780-1880 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Fusion and 2016 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…