DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Fusion vs 2016 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fusion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeKia
FusionModelOptima
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
221 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
181 HPPower141 HP
251 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4872 mmLength4855 mm
1852 mmWidth1860 mm
1478 mmHeight1465 mm
1575 KgWeight1515 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Fusion and 2016 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…