DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Fusion vs 2004 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
FusionModelMicra
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
158 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1386 cc
68 HPPower88 HP
160 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4020 mmLength3715 mm
1708 mmWidth1660 mm
1503 mmHeight1525 mm
1105 KgWeight975 Kg
2488 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Fusion and 2004 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…