2016 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus Trend X 2016 1.5 TDCi 120 HPOverall Score69.5/100
2016 Ford Focus vs 2015 Skoda Rapid Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.6 TDI CR DPF (105 Hp) 2015Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7.25 points.
69.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
FordMakeSkoda
FocusModelRapid
2016Model year2015
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
10,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
193 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower105 HP
300 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption4,8 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,4 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption3,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
PowershiftTransmission—
16Tyre size175/70 R14; 185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
4538 mmLength4483 mm
1823 mmWidth1706 mm
1469 mmHeight1461 mm
1364 kgWeight1265 Kg
421 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2602 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Focus and 2015 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…