DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford Focus vs 2010 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJeep
FocusModelCommander
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
3/5Doors5

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
241 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2522 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
225 HPPower218 HP
320 NmTorque510 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank78 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/40 R18Tyre size245/65R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4362 mmLength4787 mm
1840 mmWidth1900 mm
1447 mmHeight1826 mm
1392 KgWeight2245 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford Focus and 2010 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…