DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Focus vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 28.25 points.

93.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
FocusModelPolo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

4,7 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
266 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement999 cc
350 HPPower110 HP
440 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank45 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/35 R19Tyre size215/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength3987 mm
1823 mmWidth1698 mm
1472 mmHeight1488 mm
1524 KgWeight1090 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2469 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Focus and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 28.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…