2012 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 TDCi (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score51.25/100
2012 Ford Focus vs 2003 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 3.2i V6 (218 Hp) 2003Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 17.25 points.
51.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationOpel Omega
FordMakeOpel
FocusModelOmega
2012Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationOpel Omega
8,6 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
218 km/hTop speed240 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement3175 cc
163 HPPower218 HP
0 NmTorque290 Nm
—Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationOpel Omega
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank75 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationOpel Omega
—Length4898 mm
—Width1776 mm
—Height1455 mm
—Weight1710 Kg
—Wheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Focus and 2003 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 17.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…