2002 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 i 16V ZX3 (131 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
2002 Ford Focus vs 2002 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (136 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
FordMakeKia
FocusModelOptima
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
180 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
131 HPPower136 HP
183 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
4270 mmLength4745 mm
1699 mmWidth1815 mm
1430 mmHeight1420 mm
1200 KgWeight1478 Kg
2616 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Focus and 2002 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…