2004 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 16V ST170 (172 Hp) 2004Overall Score62.5/100
2004 Ford Focus vs 2004 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2004Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
FordMakeKia
FocusModelOptima
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
172 HPPower149 HP
197 NmTorque193 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/45 R17Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationKia Optima
4178 mmLength4745 mm
1702 mmWidth1815 mm
1481 mmHeight1420 mm
1245 KgWeight1405 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford Focus and 2004 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…