1998 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.8 Turbo DI (90 Hp) 1998Overall Score52.25/100
1998 Ford Focus vs 1998 Geo Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1998Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationGeo Tracker
FordMakeGeo
FocusModelTracker
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationGeo Tracker
14,9 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
90 HPPower97 HP
200 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationGeo Tracker
DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationGeo Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears3
175/70 R14Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationGeo Tracker
4362 mmLength—
1698 mmWidth—
1430 mmHeight—
1205 KgWeight—
2615 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Ford Focus and 1998 Geo Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…