2013 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT (105 Hp) 2013Overall Score57.25/100
2013 Ford Focus vs 2013 Skoda Rapid Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.6 TDI (90 Hp) 2013Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
FordMakeSkoda
FocusModelRapid
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
12,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
187 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16; 205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size185/60 R15; 215/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationSkoda Rapid
4556 mmLength4304 mm
1823 mmWidth1706 mm
1505 mmHeight1459 mm
1307 KgWeight1260 Kg
2648 mmWheelbase2602 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Ford Focus and 2013 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…