DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford Focus vs 2006 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

57.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
FordMakeMazda
FocusModel3
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
10,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
190 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
115 HPPower105 HP
155 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
4342 mmLength4420 mm
1840 mmWidth1755 mm
1497 mmHeight1465 mm
1255 KgWeight1185 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford Focus and 2006 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…