DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Focus vs 1999 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
FocusModelFocus
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
171 km/hTop speed171 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
125 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4152 mmLength4152 mm
1698 mmWidth1698 mm
1430 mmHeight1430 mm
1068 KgWeight1068 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Focus and 1999 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…