DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Flex vs 2017 Nissan Maxima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
FlexModelMaxima
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
364 HPPower300 HP
475 NmTorque354 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6GearsCVT
235/60 R17Tyre size245/45 R18; 245/40 R19
YesABS—

Dimensions

5130 mmLength4897 mm
1930 mmWidth1859 mm
1727 mmHeight1435 mm
—Weight1574 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Flex and 2017 Nissan Maxima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…