DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Flex vs 2016 Lincoln MKS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLincoln
FlexModelMKS
2014Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
364 HPPower304 HP
475 NmTorque378 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 SelectShift
235/60 R17Tyre size255/45 R19 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength5222 mm
1930 mmWidth2017 mm
1727 mmHeight1565 mm
—Weight1907 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Flex and 2016 Lincoln MKS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…