DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Flex vs 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJeep
FlexModelGrand Cherokee
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
6-7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
364 HPPower294 HP
475 NmTorque353 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank93 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears8
235/60 R17Tyre size245/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength4822 mm
1930 mmWidth1943 mm
1727 mmHeight1761 mm
—Weight2121 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2915 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Flex and 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…