2012 • Ford
Flex
Ford Flex 3.5 V6 (355 Hp) 2012Overall Score78.75/100
2012 Ford Flex vs 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Jeep
Grand Cherokee
Jeep Grand Cherokee 3.6 V6 (290 Hp) 2017Overall Score78.5/100
WINNER
Ford Flex
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FlexSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
FordMakeJeep
FlexModelGrand Cherokee
2012Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
6-7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford FlexSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
—0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
355 HPPower290 HP
355 NmTorque347 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FlexSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank93 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
13,7 ltAverage consumption10,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FlexSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears8
235/60 R18Tyre size265/60 R18; 265/50 R20
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FlexSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
5130 mmLength4828 mm
2032 mmWidth1943 mm
1727 mmHeight1792-1802 mm
2105 KgWeight2191-2279 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2915 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Flex and 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Comments are loading…