DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Ford Flex vs 2004 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FlexSpecificationAlpina B3
FordMakeAlpina
FlexModelB3
2008Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford FlexSpecificationAlpina B3
—0–100 km/h5,4 s
0 km/hTop speed270 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3346 cc
355 HPPower305 HP
355 NmTorque362 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FlexSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank63 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,2 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
13,7 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FlexSpecificationAlpina B3
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/60 R18Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FlexSpecificationAlpina B3
5130 mmLength4471 mm
2032 mmWidth1739 mm
1727 mmHeight1414 mm
2105 KgWeight1450 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Ford Flex and 2004 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…