DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Ford Flex vs 2005 Toyota Aristo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
FlexModelAristo
2008Model year2005
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
262 HPPower280 HP
336 NmTorque432 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,4 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/60 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength4865 mm
2032 mmWidth1800 mm
1727 mmHeight1435 mm
—Weight1680 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Ford Flex and 2005 Toyota Aristo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…