DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Ford Flex vs 2004 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChrysler
FlexModelConcorde
2008Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

185 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
262 HPPower258 HP
336 NmTorque348 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/60 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength5310 mm
2032 mmWidth1890 mm
1727 mmHeight1435 mm
—Weight1690 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Ford Flex and 2004 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…