DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford Figo vs 2015 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FigoSpecificationVolvo V40
FordMakeVolvo
FigoModelV40
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Ford FigoSpecificationVolvo V40
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
112 HPPower115 HP
136 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FigoSpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption4,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,4 lt
—Average consumption3,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FigoSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FigoSpecificationVolvo V40
3995 mmLength4369 mm
1695 mmWidth1802 mm
1525 mmHeight1445 mm
—Weight1257 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford Figo and 2015 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…