DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford Figo vs 2015 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
FigoModelCaddy
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
112 HPPower125 HP
136 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4878 mm
1695 mmWidth1793 mm
1525 mmHeight1836 mm
—Weight1423-1447 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase3006 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford Figo and 2015 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…