DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford Figo vs 2017 Nissan Pulsar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
FigoModelPulsar
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
100 HPPower110 HP
215 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption4,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,3 lt
—Average consumption3,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4387 mm
1695 mmWidth1768 mm
1525 mmHeight1520 mm
—Weight1306 kg
—Luggage capacity385 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

Nissan PulsarDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford Figo and 2017 Nissan Pulsar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…