DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford Figo vs 2015 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSkoda
FigoModelOctavia
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
215 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption4,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,3 lt
—Average consumption3,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4659 mm
1695 mmWidth1814 mm
1525 mmHeight1461 mm
—Weight1305 kg
—Luggage capacity568 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

Skoda OctaviaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford Figo and 2015 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…