DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Ford Figo vs 2018 Suzuki Swift Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSuzuki
FigoModelSwift
2018Model year2018
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1196 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
112 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
—TransmissionCVT
175/65 R14Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength3840 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1525 mmHeight1495 mm
—Weight900 kg
—Luggage capacity242 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

Suzuki SwiftDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsReversing CameraLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Ford Figo and 2018 Suzuki Swift approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…