DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford Fiesta vs 2015 Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSkoda
FiestaModelRapid
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
100 HPPower110 HP
170 NmTorque175 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
PowerShiftTransmission—
15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3969 mmLength4483 mm
1764 mmWidth1706 mm
1495 mmHeight1461 mm
1122 kgWeight1110 Kg
276 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2602 mm

Additional Features

Ford FiestaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB Port
Skoda Rapid

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford Fiesta and 2015 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…