DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Acura NSX vs 2002 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura NSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

76.25–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura NSXSpecificationVolvo XC90
AcuraMakeVolvo
NSXModelXC90
1999Model year2002
CoupeBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Acura NSXSpecificationVolvo XC90
5,9 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
270 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2977 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
274 HPPower272 HP
284 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura NSXSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption18,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,6 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Acura NSXSpecificationVolvo XC90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
245/40 R17Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura NSXSpecificationVolvo XC90
4425 mmLength4800 mm
1810 mmWidth1890 mm
1175 mmHeight1740 mm
1370 KgWeight2100 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Acura NSX and 2002 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura NSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…