DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Fiesta vs 1996 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fiesta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
FiestaModel121
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

19,5 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
143 km/hTop speed143 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
50 HPPower50 HP
97 NmTorque97 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3828 mmLength3828 mm
1634 mmWidth1634 mm
1320 mmHeight1330 mm
920 KgWeight930 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Fiesta and 1996 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fiesta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…