DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Ford Fiesta vs 2000 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRover
FiestaModelMini MK
2001Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
160 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
68 HPPower63 HP
108 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank34 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3917 mmLength3100 mm
1683 mmWidth1440 mm
1417 mmHeight1350 mm
1035 KgWeight700 Kg
2487 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Ford Fiesta and 2000 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…