DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Fiesta vs 2000 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 121

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
FiestaModel121
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
110 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55R14Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3828 mmLength3828 mm
1634 mmWidth1634 mm
1320 mmHeight1330 mm
912 KgWeight915 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Fiesta and 2000 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 121 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…