DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Ford Fiesta vs 1990 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRover
FiestaModelMini MK
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4+1Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

18,6 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
180 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1118 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
55 HPPower61 HP
0 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank34 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
155/70 R13Tyre size145/70 R12

Dimensions

3743 mmLength3050 mm
1606 mmWidth1410 mm
1379 mmHeight1350 mm
845 KgWeight695 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Ford Fiesta and 1990 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…