2000 • Ford
Explorer
Ford Explorer 5.0 V8 4WD XLT (210 Hp) 2000Overall Score70.75/100
2000 Ford Explorer vs 1996 Holden Commodore Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 5.0 i V8 SS (224 Hp) 1996Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Ford Explorer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ExplorerSpecificationHolden Commodore
FordMakeHolden
ExplorerModelCommodore
2000Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford ExplorerSpecificationHolden Commodore
—0–100 km/h7,9 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement5034 cc
210 HPPower224 HP
373 NmTorque385 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ExplorerSpecificationHolden Commodore
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ExplorerSpecificationHolden Commodore
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford ExplorerSpecificationHolden Commodore
4788 mmLength4861 mm
1783 mmWidth1794 mm
1699 mmHeight1448 mm
1891 KgWeight1450 Kg
2832 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Explorer and 1996 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…