DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Ford Explorer vs 2004 Ford Sport Trac Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExplorerModelSport Trac
2007Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h—
158 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3998 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
212 HPPower213 HP
344 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank0 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4813 mmLength—
1832 mmWidth—
1814 mmHeight—
1995 KgWeight—
2890 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Ford Explorer and 2004 Ford Sport Trac approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…