DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Explorer vs 2002 Nissan Murano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
ExplorerModelMurano
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
171 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
208 HPPower248 HP
339 NmTorque333 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank82 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
255/70 R16Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4765 mm
1790 mmWidth1880 mm
1800 mmHeight1690 mm
1990 KgWeight1588 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Explorer and 2002 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…