2002 • Ford
Explorer
Ford Explorer 4.0 XLT 4WD (208 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Ford Explorer vs 2001 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 3.9 V8 (190 Hp) 2001Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Explorer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ExplorerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
FordMakeLand Rover
ExplorerModelRange Rover
2002Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford ExplorerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
10,9 s0–100 km/h—
171 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3900 cc
208 HPPower190 HP
339 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ExplorerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank0 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption—
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford ExplorerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4790 mmLength—
1790 mmWidth—
1800 mmHeight—
1990 KgWeight—
2830 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Explorer and 2001 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSHolden Caprice vs Ford Explorer2002 and 2002 model yearsVSLand Rover Range Rover vs Ford Explorer2001 and 2002 model years
VSHolden Commodore vs Ford Explorer2000 and 2002 model years
VSNissan Murano vs Ford Explorer2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSChrysler Pacifica vs Ford Explorer2004 and 2002 model yearsComments are loading…