DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Explorer vs 1996 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
ExplorerModelDiscovery
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
171 km/hTop speed171 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3532 cc
208 HPPower155 HP
339 NmTorque261 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank82 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption19,1 lt
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt
—Average consumption14,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4520 mm
1790 mmWidth1795 mm
1800 mmHeight1915 mm
1990 KgWeight1925 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Explorer and 1996 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…