DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Explorer vs 2002 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
ExplorerModelCommodore
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
177 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3958 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
160 HPPower207 HP
305 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4536 mmLength5084 mm
1783 mmWidth1847 mm
1714 mmHeight1545 mm
1807 KgWeight1635 Kg
2593 mmWheelbase2938 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Explorer and 2002 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…