DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Explorer vs 2003 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeBuick
ExplorerModelRegal
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
177 km/hTop speed195 km/h
3958 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
155 HPPower203 HP
298 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4 Hydramatic
225/70 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4429 mmLength4983 mm
1783 mmWidth1847 mm
1714 mmHeight1438 mm
1736 KgWeight1600 Kg
2593 mmWheelbase2769 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Explorer and 2003 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…