DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford Explorer vs 1997 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
ExplorerModelCommodore
1997Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
180 km/hTop speed195 km/h
3958 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
155 HPPower200 HP
298 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4429 mmLength4861 mm
1783 mmWidth1794 mm
1714 mmHeight1448 mm
1671 KgWeight1370 Kg
2593 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford Explorer and 1997 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…