DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford Explorer vs 2006 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1.25 points.

77.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolvo
ExplorerModelXC90
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
158 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3998 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
212 HPPower272 HP
344 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank72 lt
21,4 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
15,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size235/60 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4813 mmLength4800 mm
1832 mmWidth1890 mm
1814 mmHeight1740 mm
2005 KgWeight2100 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford Explorer and 2006 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…