DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford Explorer vs 2014 Nissan Murano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
ExplorerModelMurano
2017Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
183 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
249 HPPower249 HP
346 NmTorque334 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank82 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6 SelectShiftGearsX-Tronic CVT
245/60 R18; 255/50 R20Tyre size235/65 R18; 235/55 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength4860 mm
1988 mmWidth1885 mm
1788 mmHeight1720 mm
—Weight1790-1830 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford Explorer and 2014 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…