DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Explorer vs 2016 Fiat Freemont Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.5–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFiat
ExplorerModelFreemont
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
193 km/hTop speed208 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3605 cc
340 HPPower280 HP
485 NmTorque342 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption15,9 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6 SelectShiftGears6
255/50 R20Tyre size225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength4910 mm
1988 mmWidth1878 mm
1788 mmHeight1705 mm
—Weight2031 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Explorer and 2016 Fiat Freemont approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…