DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Expedition vs 1996 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
ExpeditionModelCommodore
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5034 cc
232 HPPower224 HP
441 NmTorque385 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank80 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5200 mmLength4861 mm
2000 mmWidth1794 mm
1900 mmHeight1448 mm
—Weight1450 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Expedition and 1996 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…